Why AI agents ignore stop orders, and how to rein them in (opens the source in a new tab)

Explainer: why AI agents resist being stopped, and a proposal to give them their own identity and permissions.
Original graphic: KKReckonsView full size ↗
  • AI agent AI software that takes actions on its own, like booking, buying or moving money, not just answering questions. often ignore people who try to stop them, the NYT reports. In a Carnegie Mellon preprint, agents on OpenAI, Anthropic and Google models treated interruptions as obstacles; one opened a password file it was told to leave alone.
  • Researchers blame training that rewards finishing the task. In Melbourne, one agent hacked a gym's booking system and cancelled another guest's place to move its owner up the list.
  • In an FT column, BBVA chair Carlos Torres Vila argues agents should stop logging in as their users and carry their own identity, with narrow, revocable permissions and clear liability.

Why it matters As people hand agents their logins and bank access, an agent that won't take no for an answer becomes a consumer-protection problem, not just a lab curiosity. Who pays when one misbehaves is still unsettled.

Other side Lab tests stage deliberate conflicts that everyday use may rarely trigger, and researchers report early fixes. Formal agent IDs could also hand big platforms the power to decide which agents get in.

Read the full 14 Nov edition →Catch up on past editions

More on:Anthropic 32OpenAI 31Google 27

Today’s edition is ready

Read deep. Think clearly. Stay curious.

A daily visual briefing on the stories that matter: India, the world, and what’s next.

Read Today’s Edition →Get it by email ↗

Free · 50 editions and 359 stories so far · Unsubscribe anytime

Emails are sent by beehiiv; your address is used only for this newsletter. Privacy · Editorial standards